Skip to content
Psilocybin Research

Where this publication takes a position

Most of this site reports. A smaller part of it argues. This page is the line between the two, drawn where a reader can see it.

InsightsReviewed

The short answer

8 pieces of analysis and 4 running ledgers. A ledger reports what a statute, a registry or a price list says and gets out of the way. Analysis reads the same material and states a conclusion the sources do not state themselves — labeled as ours, with the evidence beside it. Publications in this field mix the two freely, which is how a reader ends up treating somebody’s reading of a trial as the trial’s own result.

Analysis

The pieces where we take a view

Each of these reads a body of evidence and reaches a conclusion of its own. The conclusion is marked as ours, and the sources sit on the same page, so you can follow the reasoning and take a different view of it.

Interview

Our first one is still ahead of us

The reference publication in this field runs a strong interview line, and it is one of the reasons to read it. Ours starts empty, and saying so plainly beats filling the space with quotes lifted from other people’s conversations and presented as our own reporting.

What we would want from a first one is narrow and checkable: a principal investigator on the design decision they would change, a state regulator on what the licensing data actually shows, a facilitator on the screening question that turns people away. When one is published it appears here with the subject named and the date on it.

Be there for the first one

The monthly briefing carries every new piece of analysis, and it will carry the interviews as they land. One email a month, and the workbook arrives first.

The workbook arrives right away, then a monthly briefing. Unsubscribe in a click.

Common questions

Questions about how this is organized

What is the difference between analysis and a ledger here?
A ledger reports what a statute, a registry or a price list says, and stays out of the way. Analysis reads the same kind of material and reaches a conclusion of its own — for example that a famous depression trial is being reported backwards. Both are useful, one of them is an argument, and a reader deserves a clear view of which they are looking at.
Does Psilocybin Research publish interviews?
Our first one is still ahead of us. When it publishes it appears here with the subject named and the date on it. Keeping the category honest and empty beats filling it with reprinted quotes from other people's interviews and presenting them as our own reporting.
How do you decide what is worth an argument?
The test is whether the claim is already circulating. We write analysis where a specific misreading is common enough that a reader has probably met it, and where going back to the primary source settles the question — that combination is what makes the piece worth someone's time.